RESUMO
BackgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis, including either Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), are some of the most diagnosed autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) in rheumatologists' routine clinical practice [1]. Understanding patients' health and functional status is crucial to provide personalized management strategies to optimize disease control and enhance the quality of life.ObjectivesWe aimed to compare disease burden in patients with RA, PsA or AS by assessing Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Health, Global Mental Health, Physical Function and Fatigue 4a together with VAS Pain.MethodsData were obtained in the international COVID vaccination in autoimmune rheumatic diseases study second e-survey (COVAD study). Demographics, AIRD diagnosis, disease activity, PROMIS Global Physical health, PROMIS Global Mental Health, PROMIS Physical Function SF10 and PROMIS Fatigue 4a score were extracted from the COVAD study database. For this study, we only included patients with self-reported RA or spondyloarthritis (either PsA or AS) undergoing active treatment with conventional synthetic disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs) and/or biologic DMARDs, who answered all the survey questions. Active disease was defined as the patient's perception of their disease as active in the four weeks before their first COVID-19 vaccine shot. Analysis of Variance with Bartlett's and Tukey's test was used to compare continuous variables between groups.ResultsFrom January to June 2022, n.1907 patients with RA, female 87.62% (1671/1907), with mean age (±SD) 50.95 ±13.67, n.311 patients with PsA, female 67.20% (209/311), with a mean age of 50.42 ±12.70, and n.336 patients with AS, male 51.31% (209/311), with a mean age of 43.13 ±12.75 years, responded to the COVAD e-survey.In those with active disease, neither physical health, global mental health, physical function, fatigue, nor pain were different among groups (Table 1, Figure 1). Patients with inactive AS had higher mean global physical health scores than RA patients (13.13 ±2.93 VS RA 12.48 ±2.90, p=0.01, Table 1). Those with inactive RA or PsA showed more severe fatigue (PsA 10.58 ±2.22, RA 10.45 ±4.08 VS 9.4 ±4.13, p =0.01 for both). Patients with inactive RA also reported poorer physical function and more residual pain than those with AS (37.79 ±8.86 VS 41.13 ±7.79, p<0.001;3.87 ±2.45 VS 3.34 ±2.39, p=0.01, respectively). Similarly, residual pain was perceived as higher in patients with inactive PsA than those with AS (4.04 ±2.50 VS 3.34 ±2.39, p=0.01)ConclusionDisease burden is roughly comparable in patients with active RA, PsA or AS. Patients with inactive RA and PsA suffer higher disease burden than those with inactive AS.Reference[1]Mease PJ, Liu M, Rebello S, Kang H, Yi E, Park Y, Greenberg JD. Comparative Disease Burden in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, or Axial Spondyloarthritis: Data from Two Corrona Registries. Rheumatol Ther. 2019 Dec;6(4):529-542.Table 1.Patient-Reported Outcome Measures between groups.Inactive diseaseAS (n.185)PsA (n.179)RA (n.1167)MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDPROMIS Global Physical Health13.13*2.9512.433.2712.482.90p=0.01, VS RAPROMIS Global Mental Health13.313.3612.973.3312.843.17PROMIS Fatigue 4a9.44.1310.58*4.2210.45*4.08p=0.01, bothPROMIS Physical Function SF10 Score41.137.3939.279.0137.79*8.86p<0.001, VS ASVAS Pain3.342.394.04*2.503.87*2.45p=0.01, bothActive DiseaseAS (n.35)PsA (n.38)RA (n.189)MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDPROMIS Global Physical Health11.053.1910.102.7611.243.41PROMIS Global Mental Health11.313.2610.843.6311.893.30PROMIS Fatigue 4a12.944.8712.844.4211.754.68PROMIS Physical Function SF10 Score35.829.6233.528.7634.909.80VAS Pain4.682.775.02.544.682.61Figure 1.Violin plots showing kernel densities, quartiles and median for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for patients with RA, PsA and AS, stratified by disease activity status.[Figure omitted. See PDF]Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsVincenzo Venerito: None declared, Marc Fornaro: None declared, Florenzo Iannone: None declared, Lorenzo Cavagna: None declared, Masataka Kuwana: None declared, Vishwesh Agarwal: None declared, Naveen Ravichandran: None declared, Jessica Day Grant/research support from: JD has received research funding from CSL Limited., Mrudula Joshi: None declared, Sreoshy Saha: None declared, Syahrul Sazliyana Shaharir: None declared, Wanruchada Katchamart: None declared, Phonpen Akarawatcharangura Goo: None declared, Lisa Traboco: None declared, Yi-Ming Chen: None declared, Parikshit Sen: None declared, James B. Lilleker Speakers bureau: JBL has received speaker honoraria/participated in advisory boards for Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, and Biogen. None is related to this manuscript., Consultant of: JBL has received speaker honoraria/participated in advisory boards for Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, and Biogen. None is related to this manuscript., Arvind Nune: None declared, John Pauling: None declared, Chris Wincup: None declared, Ai Lyn Tan Speakers bureau: ALT has received honoraria for advisory boards and speaking for Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB., Nelly Ziade Speakers bureau: NZ has received speaker fees, advisory board fees, and research grants from Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, NewBridge, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, and Pierre Fabre;none are related to this manuscript, Grant/research support from: NZ has received speaker fees, advisory board fees, and research grants from Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, NewBridge, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, and Pierre Fabre;none are related to this manuscript, Marcin Milchert: None declared, Abraham Edgar Gracia-Ramos: None declared, Carlo Vinicio Caballero: None declared, COVAD Study: None declared, Vikas Agarwal: None declared, Rohit Aggarwal Speakers bureau: RA has a consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from the following companies: Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Genentech, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, AstraZeneca, Corbus, Kezar, Abbvie, Janssen, Alexion, Argenx, Q32, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roivant., Grant/research support from: RA has a consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from the following companies: Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Genentech, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, AstraZeneca, Corbus, Kezar, Abbvie, Janssen, Alexion, Argenx, Q32, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roivant., Latika Gupta: None declared.
RESUMO
Background: Coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19) represents the most important pandemic of the last century. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has produced more than 170 million cases and more than 3 million deaths. Due to the easy spread of the infection and the possibility of serious clinical manifestations, the role of anti-COVID 19 vaccination is essential. Vaccines with different mechanisms of action have been developed: mRNA-based, such as Biontech-Pfzer and Moderna, and viral vectored, such as AstraZeneca and Janssen. Despite possible adverse events, benefts afforded by these vaccines signifcantly outweigh potential risks associated with their administration in the general population. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs), secondary to vaccination, in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Spondyloarthritis (SpA), immune-mediated diseases treated with immunomodulating drugs, by administering a questionnaire. Methods: 294 patients (201 f and 93 m) were enrolled with a diagnosis of arthritis (RA 28%, PsA 43%, SpA 28%). Results: Of the 294 enrolled patients, 107 underwent COVID vaccination, 73% with Biontech-Pfzer vaccine, 20% Astrazeneca and 6% Moderna. 50% of patients completed the entire vaccination cycle. 46% of patients presented AEs after the frst dose of vaccine (45% of vaccinated with Biontech-Pfzer;48% of vaccinated with Astrazeneca, 33% of vaccinated with Moderna). The most frequently observed AEs are: pain at the injection site (17%), fever (13%), headache (12%), myalgia (12%), fatigue (7.5%). Only 2.9% of patients had arthritis fares. The greatest trend of AEs was observed in patients with PsA (48%), and RA (26%). 32% of patients receiving the second dose of vaccine presented AEs (40% Moderna, 32% Biontech-Pfzer). The most frequently observed AEs after the second dose are: pain at the injection site (4.7%), fever (9%), headache (2.8%), myalgia (6%). No patient had arthritis fare after the second dose. The greatest trend of AEs was observed in patients with SpA (66%). Only 11% of patients presented AEs after the administration of both doses. Thirteen percent of patients did not follow the clinician's recommendations for immunomodulatory drug management, provided as per ACR or SIR recommendations. Conclusion: The incidence of adverse events in arthritis patients was in line with that of the general population, without presenting serious manifestations, such as thrombosis, and without indicating a preference on the type of vaccine.
RESUMO
Background: In recent times, safety and potential adverse effects (AEs) of Sars-CoV-2 vaccines have gained great relevance and have been a central topic in Scientific discussion. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of AEs after Sars-CoV-2 vaccine administration in patients affected by Connective Tissue Disease, Vasculitis or Polymyalgia Rheumatica. Moreover, we assessed patients' adherence to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)1 or Italian Rheumatology Society (SIR)2 recommendations. Methods: 139 patients affected by Connective Tissue Disease, Vasculitis or Polymyalgia Rheumatica were enrolled at the Rheumatology Units of University Hospitals of Bari and Foggia. All patients were given a questionnaire to evaluate vaccine type and dose number, AEs, potential pre-vaccine prophylaxis, immuno-suppressive therapy and its possible suspension according to the clinical guidance summary proposed by ACR or SIR. Results: Among the 139 enrolled patients (120 females and 19 males, mean age 54 ± 14,7 year, mean disease duration 8,6 ± 7, 4 years), 31 subjects (19%) received anti Sars-CoV-2 vaccination. 5 patients received the Astra-Zeneca COVID-19 vaccine, 23 the BioNTech-Pfzer COVID-19 vaccine and 3 the Moderna vaccine. Only 48% of subjects received two doses. 42% of patients reported non-severe AEs after the frst dose of vaccine, specifcally 45% of patients who received the BioNTech-Pfzer COVID-19 vaccine, 40% of those who were administered the AstraZeneca vaccine and 33% of those who received the Moderna vaccine. Most frequent AEs were site injection pain (19%), fatigue (13%), headache (13%), myalgia (6%), fever (6%), nausea (3%), rheumatic disease fare (3%) (the latest was reported only among the Polymyalgia Rheumatica patients). Considering the different diseases, the highest trend of AEs was observed in Polymialgya Rheumatica (66%), Systemic Sclerosis (57%), Sjogren Syndrome (40%) and undifferentiated connective tissue disease (23%) patients. 30% of patients who received the second vaccine dose reported AEs. All of them were administered the BioNTech-Pfzer COVID-19 vaccine. Most reported AEs after the second vaccine dose were site injection pain (6%), headache (3%), myalgia (6%), fever (6%). The highest trend of AEs was observed in undifferentiated connective tissue disease (60%) and Sjogren Syndrome (33%) patients. Only 13 % of subjects who reported AEs after the frst vaccine administration, reported AEs also after the second dose. Only 9,7% of patients did not comply with the COVID-19 vaccine clinical guidance prosed by ACR or SIR regarding immunosuppressive treatment management before and after immunization. Conclusion: Patients enrolled in this study developed mild AEs. Only among Polymyalgia Rheumatica patients were described disease fares and higher trend of AEs. Although patients affected by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Vasculitis were enrolled, none of them reported severe AEs, included the extensively discussed post-vaccine thrombosis. We found no signifcant dissimilarity of AEs relating to different types of vaccine and good patient compliance to physician recommendations about treatment management.
RESUMO
Background: Patients with autoimmune systemic diseases (ASDs) can be counted among frail populations as regards the predisposition to COVID-19 due to the frequent visceral organ involvement and comorbidities, as well as the ongoing immunomodulating treatments. Objectives: Our long-term multicenter telephone survey prospectively investigated the prevalence, prognostic factors, and outcomes of COVID-19 in Italian ASD patients during the frst 3 pandemic waves. Methods: A large series of 3,918 ASD patients (815 M, 3103 F;mean age 59±12SD years) was consecutively recruited at the 36 referral centers of COVID-19 & ASD Italian Study Group. In particular, ASD series encompassed the following conditions: rheumatoid arthritis (n: 981), psoriatic arthritis (n: 471), ankylosing spondylitis (n: 159), systemic sclerosis (n: 1,738), systemic lupus (172), systemic vasculitis (n: 219), and a miscellany of other ASDs (n: 178). The development of COVID-19 was recorded by means of telephone survey using standardized symptom-assessment questionnaire (1). Results: A signifcantly increased prevalence of COVID-19 (8.37% vs 6.49%;p<0.0001) was observed in our ASD patients, while the cumulative death rate revealed statistically comparable to the Italian general population (3.65% vs 2.95%;p: ns). In particular, among the 328 ASD patients complicated by COVID-19, 57 (17%) needed hospitalization, while mild-moderate manifestations were observed in the large majority of individuals (83%). In addition, 12/57 hospitalized patients died due to severe interstitial pneumonia and/or cardiovascular manifestations. Interestingly, a signifcantly higher COVID-19-related death rate was observed in systemic sclerosis patients compared to the Italian general population (6.29% vs 2.95%;p=0.018). Other adverse prognostic factors to develop COVID-19 were the patients' older age, male gender, pre-existing ASD-related interstitial lung involvement, and chronic steroid treatment. Conversely, patients treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) showed a signifcantly lower prevalence of COVID-19 compared to those without (3.58% vs 46.99%;p=0.000), as well as the chronic administration of low dose aspirin in a subgroup of SSc patients (with 5.57% vs without 27.84%;p=0.000). Conclusion: The cumulative impact of COVID-19 on ASD patients after the frst 3 pandemic waves revealed less severe than that observed during the frst phase of pandemic (1), especially with regards to the death rate that was comparable to the Italian general population in spite of the increased prevalence of complicating COVID-19 in the same ASD series. Ongoing long-term treatments, mainly csDMARDs, might usefully contribute to generally positive outcomes of in this frail patients' population. Of note, a signifcantly increased COVID-19-related mortality was recorded in only SSc patients' subgroup, possibly favored by pre-existing lung fbrosis. Among different ASD, SSc deserves special attention, since it shares the main pathological alterations with COVID-19, namely the interstitial lung involvement and the endothelial injury responsible for diffuse microangiopathy. Besides SSc, the patients' subgroups characterized by older age, chronic steroid treatment, pre-existing interstitial lung disease, and/or impaired COVID-19 vaccine response (1-3), may deserve well-designed prevention and management strategies.
RESUMO
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination plays a crucial role as pivotal strategies to curb the coronavirus dis-ease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Despite the mass-scale vaccination, literature data about the incidence of disease fares in IIM patients are still not reported as well as the immunological condition. Objectives: The present study aimed to describe the clinical status of patients affected by IIM after vaccination against COVID19 in order to assess the number of relapses or immune-mediated reactions in a cohort of Italian patients with such disease. Methods: We included all patients affected by IIM and followed by Myositis Clinic, Rheumatology and Respiratory Diseases Units, Siena University Hospital, Bari University Hospital, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, and Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo. Inclusion criteria were a recent (<3 months) clinical and serological assessment before the survey and a defnite diagnosis of dermatomyosi-tis, polymyositis and anti-synthetase syndrome. All patients underwent a telephone survey in order to establish their clinical status and potential relapses after vaccination. Results: A total of 119 IIM patients (median, IQR 58 (47-66) years;32 males) were consecutively enrolled. Fifty had a diagnosis of DM, 39 had PM and 30 had ASS. The median months of disease duration was 79.62±83.98. According to number of organs involvement, forty-two had only one, 45 had two organs involvement, 20 had three, 11 had four and one had five. The majority of them received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine, except four patients who refused the vaccination: 94 (78.9%) Cominarty, 16 (13.4%) Moderna, 5 (0.04%) AZ. Seven (0.06%) patients had fare after vaccination, the majority of them were mild except one major with three organs involved and one life-threatening with systemic involvement. In order to understand or predict the effect of demographic and clinical features on the fare development after vaccination, a logistic regression analysis was performed. The goodness-of-ft statistics showed a Chi2 associated with the Log ratio (L.R.) of 0.045. From the probability associated with the Chi-square tests, the Type II analysis showed the variable that most influences the development of fare was the number of organs involved (p=0.047). Sixty-eight patients received the third dose of COVID-19 vaccination: 51 (75%) Cominarty and 17 (25%) Moderna. Only one (0.01%) patient (the same who had life-threatening fare with systemic involvement after two doses) had fare after third dose and eventually died. Conclusion: Vaccines against SARS-CoV2 have provided, both in registratory studies and in preliminary real-life evidence, an overall good efficacy and safety. Nevertheless, only scanty data are available for rheumatic patients in general and the ones affected by IIM in particular. To the best of our knowledge, ours represent the largest cohort of IIM patients in which immunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV2 vaccine was assessed. In line with real-life data from other diseases, we found a non-statistically signifcant risk of relapse in our patients, which occurred seldom, usually mild and in patients with a more severe and aggressive course of disease.
RESUMO
Heart failure (HF) is a chronic, progressive, and inexorable syndrome affecting worldwide billion of patients (equally distributed among men and women), with prevalence estimate of 1–3% in developed countries. HF leads to enormous direct and indirect costs, and because of ageing population, the total number of HF patients keep rising, approximately 10% in patients >65 years old. Exercise training (ET) is widely recognized as an evidence-based adjunct treatment modality for patients with HF, and growing evidence is emerging among elderly patients with HF. We used relevant data from literature search (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE) highlighting the epidemiology of HF; focusing on central and peripheral mechanisms underlying the beneficial effect of ET in HF patients; and on frail HF elderly patients undergoing ET. Since many Countries ordered a lockdown in early stages pandemic trying to limit infections, COVID-19 pandemic, and its limitation to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation operativity was also discussed. ET exerts both central and peripheral adaptations that clinically translate into anti-remodeling effects, increased functional capacity and reduced morbidity and mortality. Ideally, ET programs should be prescribed in a patient-tailored approach, particularly in frail elderly patients with HF. In conclusion, given the complexity of HF syndrome, combining, and tailoring different ET modalities is mandatory. A procedural algorithm according to patient’s baseline clinical characteristics [i.e., functional capacity, comorbidity, frailty status (muscle strength, balance, usual daily activities, hearing and vision impairment, sarcopenia, and inability to actively exercise), logistics, individual preferences and goals] has been proposed. Increasing long-term adherence and reaching the frailest patients are challenging goals for future initiatives in the field.
RESUMO
Background: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of pathological conditions characterized by muscle inflammation, and sometimes by inflammatory involvement of other organs, such as skin (in dermatomyositis) and lungs (pulmonary interstitial disease). Description of the case: 54-year-old woman, turns to the Emergency Room of Miulli Hospital in March 2021 for worsening dyspnea. In medical history: previous recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. She is admitted to Medicine Unit, where the characteristic signs and symptoms of myositis were objected: myasthenia affecting the proximal muscles, myalgias, plantar desquamation of the feet (climber's foot) and fingers (mechanic's hands), Gottron's papules. There are also: pericardial effusion, signs of pulmonary hypertension on echocardiogram, consolidating pulmonary parenchymal changes with fibrotic evolution on HR chest CT. She is transferred to the Rheumatology Unit of the Policlinico Di Bari to perform specific autoantibody panel (positivity of ANA, anti Jo- 1, anti Ro52), electromyography (signs of myogenic suffering), MRI of the thighs (hypotrophy and adipose replacement of the muscles of the posterior lodge) and muscle biopsy, indicative of muscle inflammation. Therapy with steroid boluses and cyclosporine 5mg/kg/day, shows quick effectiveness, and she is discharged with the diagnosis of antisynthetase syndrome. Conclusions: The diagnosis of antisynthetase syndrome is not always easy, due to the clinical heterogeneity of the disease and the need for specific instrumental and laboratory tests.
RESUMO
With the world plagued by the coronavirus pandemic, efficient automated protocols for a reliable in silico estimate of the binding strength of compounds vs SARS-CoV2-related biological targets are urgently needed. The consensus computational pipeline in drug development starts from triaging via docking tools of data-driven generated libraries of compounds followed by Molecular Dynamics (MD) techniques on a subset of the best scoring ligands. In this context, absolute binding free energy determination via MD is a crucial and challenging intermediate step, preceding the drug optimization process, using efficient alchemical MD techniques on strictly congeneric series. Here we describe an alchemical MD technique based on nonequilibrium thermodynamics capable of delivering in few hours on a modern HPC platform reliable estimates of the absolute binding free energies in drug–receptor systems. The methodology can be combined with well established alchemical relative binding free energy calculations providing an automatable workflow for drug optimization starting from a set of chemically distant ligands.
RESUMO
Background: SARS-CoV-2 infection poses a serious challenge for patients with rheumatic autoimmune systemic diseases (ASD), characterized by marked immune-system dysregulation and frequent visceral organ involvement. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in a large series of Italian patients with ASD. Methods: Our multicenter telephone survey (8-week period, March-April 2020) included a large series of 2,994 patients (584 M, 2,410 F, mean age 58.9±13.4SD years) with ASD followed at 34 tertiary referral centers of 14 regions of northern, central, and southern Italian macro areas, characterized by different prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. According to currently used criteria, COVID-19 was classified as definite COVID-19 (signs or symptoms of COVID-19 confirmed by positive oral/nasopharyngeal swabs at PCR testing) or highly suspected COVID-19 (signs or symptoms highly suggestive of Covid-19, but not confirmed by PCR testing due to limited availability of virological tests in that period). The results were analyzed performing the Odds Ratio by Java-Stat 2-way Contingency Table Analysis. Results: The main findings of the survey study revealed a significantly increased prevalence of COVID-19 in: a.the whole series of ASD patients (definite Covid-19: 22/2994, 0.73%;p=0.0007;definite COVID-19 plus highly suspected Covid-19: 74/2,994, 2.47%;p<0.0001) when compared to Italian general population of COVID-19 infected individuals (349/100000 = 0.34%;data from Italian Superior Institute of Health;h t t p s : / / w w w . e p i c e n t r o . i s s . i t / e n / c o r o n a v i r u s / sars-cov-2-national-surveillance-system). b.the subgroup of patients with connective tissue diseases or systemic vasculitis (n = 1,901) compared to the subgroup of inflammatory arthritis (n = 1,093), namely rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis (definite Covid-19: 19/1,901, 0.99%, vs 3/1,093, 0.27%;p=0.036;definite COVID-19 plus highly suspected Covid-19: 69/1,901, 3.6%, vs 5/1,093, 0.45%;p<0.0001) c.the subgroup of patients with pre-existing interstitial lung involvement (n = 526) compared to those without (n = 2,468) (definite Covid-19: 10/526, 1.90%, vs 12/2,468, 0.48%;p=0.0015;definite COVID-19 plus highly suspected Covid-19: 33/526, 6.27%, vs 41/2,468, 1.66%;p<0.0001). Of interest, the prevalence of COVID-19 did not correlate with presence/absence of different comorbidities, mainly diabetes, cardio-vascular and/or renal disorders, as well as of ongoing treatments with biological DMARDs;while patients treated with conventional DMARDs showed a significantly lower prevalence of COVID-19 compared to those without. COVID-19 was more frequently observed in the patients' populations from northern and central compared to southern Italian macro area with lower diffusion of pandemic. Clinical manifestations of Covid-19, observed in 74 patients, were generally mild or moderate;4/9 individuals requiring hospital admission died for severe pneumonia. Conclusion: The prevalence of COVID-19 observed in ASD patients during the first wave of pandemic was significantly higher than that observed in Italian general population;moreover, the actual prevalence of COVID-19 might be underestimated due to the high number of mild variants as well as the possible clinical overlapping between these two conditions. Patients with ASD should be invariably regarded as 'frail patients' during the pandemic course, considering the risk of worse outcome in the acute phase of Covid-19, as well as the potential long-term effects of viral infection. The statistically significant association of COVID-19 with connective tissue diseases/ systemic vasculitis, as well as with pre-existing interstitial lung involvement, suggests the presence of distinct clinico-pathological ASD subsets, characterized by markedly different patients' vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 infection.